NAVIGATING AUTHOR RESISTANCE TO EDITORIAL REVIEW PRIOR TO PUBLICATION

2024-02-19

A challenging scenario unfolds as the Editor-in-Chief of a journal encounters resistance from a corresponding author regarding proposed editorial edits to a brief communication. Despite the recommendation for acceptance with revisions by the section editor, the corresponding author contends that the suggested edits extend beyond typical formatting adjustments, advocating for postponing publication until the next editor-in-chief assumes office. Complicating matters further, the current Editor-in-Chief opts not to renew their contract amidst anonymous allegations regarding prolonged journal timelines.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) offers valuable guidance in such circumstances. While editors retain the prerogative to edit for journal style, grammar, and readability, authors possess the right to dissent and withhold publication consent if they disagree with the edits. However, avenues for constructive dialogue should be explored, such as inviting authors to annotate areas necessitating further attention or providing a deadline for a decision.

Should direct communication fail to yield resolution, recourse to an impartial senior editor, untethered to previous processes and conflicts of interest, may offer a viable arbitration mechanism. Both parties could agree to abide by the arbitrator's decision, fostering impartiality and fairness in the resolution process.

It is imperative that journal guidelines explicitly delineate procedures for copy, technical, and style editing, ensuring authors' informed expectations. Moreover, authors should recognize the journal's prerogative to address content that is offensive, biased, factually inaccurate, or libelous, underscoring the significance of post-acceptance editing in upholding scholarly integrity.

In navigating such challenges, transparent communication, adherence to established procedures, and a commitment to scholarly rigor are indispensable in upholding the integrity of the publication process.

Source