

Some issues of increasing the energy efficiency of ships by improving navigation methods
The section reveals the relationship between energy efficiency of shipping and navigational safety, which is of particular relevance in the context of the implementation of strict international environmental regulations (EEDI, EEXI, CII) and the growing requirements for optimizing fuel consumption. It is determined that classical methods of energy saving, in particular, reducing the speed, cannot be considered in isolation from the risks associated with the operation of a ship in difficult navigational conditions − narrow straits, areas of high traffic or unstable hydrometeorology.
The aim of the study is to develop an integrated approach to ship management that simultaneously takes into account energy efficiency and navigation risks. For the first time, the expediency of using multi-criteria routing models based on fuel consumption, accident risk, and current hydrometeorological conditions is substantiated. The article presents decision-making algorithms taking into account navigation safety constraints, which allow to adapt management actions in real time.
IMO requirements for fleet energy efficiency are outlined, as well as ways to implement them both technically and operationally. The role of digital solutions, including ECDIS, DSS, NAPA, StormGeo, Wärtsilä Voyage platforms, which support the crew in making informed decisions during the voyage, is emphasized. Particular attention is paid to the use of artificial intelligence methods for risk forecasting based on large amounts of data.
The article systemizes the classification of navigation risks (technical, human, digital, environmental), as well as methods of their assessment: qualitative (FMEA, SWOT, HAZID) and quantitative (ETA, FTA, risk matrices). The article considers the formation of an integrated hazard map, which includes trajectory points of the ship's route, maneuvering characteristics, weather forecasts, the state of equipment and crew training. It is shown that the combination of digital platforms, mathematical modelling and engineering analysis ensures informed decision-making.
An approach to building a decision support system is proposed, taking into account changes in the external environment, technical characteristics of the vessel and the level of navigation threat. The effectiveness of digital routing based on multicriteria analysis for simultaneously achieving safety and fuel efficiency is proved. The importance of the ISO 31000:2018 standard for the formation of adaptive risk management systems in maritime transport is emphasized.
The results obtained have significant scientific and applied potential. They can be used in the practice of ship-owning companies, dispatch centers, maritime administrations, as well as in the process of crew training. Priority areas for further research include improving risk forecasting models, harmonizing international standards with the specifics of the Ukrainian fleet, and implementing unified information and analytical decision support systems.
PhD, Associate Professor
Department of Navigation and Control of the Ship
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-2192
Review of Maritime Transport 2023 (2023). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available at: https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime-transport-2023
Hetherington, C., Flin, R., Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37 (4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007
Chauvin, C. (2011). Human Factors and Maritime Safety. Journal of Navigation, 64 (4), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0373463311000142
Reason, J. (2016). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. London: Routledge, 272. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543543
Wang, N., Chang, D., Yuan, J., Shi, X., Bai, X. (2020). How to maintain the safety level with the increasing capacity of the fairway: A case study of the Yangtze Estuary Deepwater Channel. Ocean Engineering, 216, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108122
Lu, C.-S., Tsai, C.-L. (2008). The effects of safety climate on vessel accidents in the container shipping context. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40 (2), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.015
International Maritime Organization. Available at: https://www.imo.org/
DNV. Available at: https://www.dnv.com
Updated IMO amendments bring sustainability to forefront. Bureau Veritas. Available at: https://marine-offshore.bureauveritas.com/updated-imo-amendments-bring-sustainability-forefront
Jon, M. H., Yu, C. I. (2023). Optimization of Ship Energy Efficiency Considering Navigational Environment and Safety. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Numerical Modelling in Engineering, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0373-3_1
International Hydrographic Organization. Available at: https://iho.int/
Stopford, M. (2008). Maritime Economics 3e. London: Routledge, 840. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020389174
Maersk. Available at: https://www.maersk.com
ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – Guidelines (2018). International Organization for Standardization.
NAPA. Voyage Optimization Systems. Available at: https://www.napa.fi/solutions/voyage-optimization/
Torskyi, V., Rossomakha, O., Oberto Santana, L. (2024). Systematic risk assessment and management in modern shipping: a comprehensive approach to safety analysis. Boston: Primedia eLaunch, 114.
DSTU ISO 31000:2018. Menedzhment ryzykiv. Pryntsypy ta nastanovy (ISO 31000:2018, IDT) (2019). Kyiv: DP «UkrNDNTs», 30.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.